Dedicated to the Tuesday Afternoon Club to C.A.R. Hoare at the occasion of his being elected Fellow of the Royal Society.
Lemma 0. For any statement S and any constant predicate C
wp(S, C) = wp(S, T) ∧ C .
Proof. By substituting for C the two constant predicates T and F, respectively. (End of Proof.)
Lemma 1. For any statement S, any predicate R, and any constant predicate C
wp(S, R ∨ C) = wp(S, R) ∨ wp(S, C) .
Proof. By substituting for C the two constant predicates T and F, respectively. (End of Proof.)
In the following, P is a predicate in x and by definition P′ = Px′x ; variables x and x′ range over the same non-empty domain.
Lemma 2. For any predicate P in x we have for all x
P = (Ax′ :: x ≠ x′ ∨ P′) .
Proof. P = (Ax′ :: P) = (Ax′ : x′ = x : P′) = (Ax′ :: x ≠ x′ ∨ P′). (End of Proof.)
Theorem. For any statement S with state space x and any predicate P we have
wp(S, P) = wp(S, T) ∧ (Ax′ :: wp(S, x ≠ x′) ∨ P′) .
Proof. wp(S, P)
= { Lemma 2 }
wp(S, (Ax′ :: x ≠ x′ ∨ P′))
= { distributivity of wp over universal quantification }
(Ax′ :: wp(S, x ≠ x′ ∨ P′))
= { Lemma 1 }
(Ax′ :: wp(S, x ≠ x′) ∨ wp(S, P′))
= { Lemma 0 }
(Ax′ :: wp(S, x ≠ x′) ∨ wp(S, T) ∧ P′)
= { wp(S, R) ⇒ wp(S, T) }
wp(S, T) ∧ (Ax′ :: wp(S, x ≠ x′) ∨ P′) .
(End of Proof.)
Hence, the predicate transformer wp(S, ?) is fully characterized by the two predicates wp(S, T) and wp(S, x ≠ x′) .
20 April 1982
Edsger W. Dijkstra Martin Rem Ronald W. Bulterman Jan L.A. van de Snepscheut W.H.J. Feijen |
Frans Peters Jan Tijmen Udding Jo Ebergen A.J.M. van Gasteren Maarten Boasson |